Rajasthan: 271 nominations valid for second phase of LS polls, 33 rejected


Jaipur, Apr 6 (IANS): The nomination papers received for 13 Lok Sabha parliamentary constituencies of Rajasthan, where polling will be held in the second phase of the elections on April 26, were scrutinised on Friday.

Chief Electoral Officer Praveen Gupta said that 271 nominations of 191 candidates were found valid, while 33 nominations of 25 candidates were rejected during scrutiny.

In Tonk-Sawai Madhopur, 12 candidates had filed 16 nominations, while 17 candidates filed 23 nominations in Ajmer, and 17 candidates filed 21 nominations in Jodhpur.

As many as 19 candidates filed 28 nominations in Barmer, eight candidates filed 15 nominations in Udaipur, 24 candidates filed 34 nominations in Jalore, 8 candidates filed 10 nominations in Banswara, and 19 candidates filed 25 nominations in Chittorgarh.

Rajsamand had 11 candidates who filed 15 nominations, 12 candidates filed 22 nominations in Bhilwara, 20 candidates filed 26 nominations in Kota, 7 candidates filed 12 nominations in Jhalawar Karan, and 17 candidates filed 21 nominations in Pali.

The CEO said that names can be withdrawn till April 8 for the second phase of voting.

 

  

Top Stories


Leave a Comment

Title: Rajasthan: 271 nominations valid for second phase of LS polls, 33 rejected



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.