Regulation of insolvent firms' shares still remains a dilemma


New Delhi, Apr 17 (IANS): As India's Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) evolves at a fast pace, a hard nut to crack for the market regulator has come up with regulations in terms of trading in the shares of companies going through resolution under IBC.

Several concerns have been raised in terms of trading in the stocks of insolvent companies as many of them gained substantially amid the bull run in the past year.

Amid concerns for public shareholders and the need for transparency, the capital market regulator has also enhanced the disclosure norms for companies under bankruptcy and they now have to inform the exchanges on any approved resolution plan.

Ashish Chhawchharia, Partner and National leader - Restructuring Services, Grant Thornton Bharat, is of the view that trading in shares of insolvent companies should be suspended.

"In several markets which have a mature insolvency regime, trading of shares of insolvent companies is immediately suspended upon commencement," he said.

He noted that while there is some merit in continuing trading to allow exit mechanisms for small shareholders, the same investors can also be susceptible to high risks due to speculation. Overall, it may be better to suspend the trading of such companies, Chhawchharia told IANS.

Despite steps by the regulator, several concerns exist regarding manipulation by the promoters, who might have lost control of the company but are still are the promoter shareholders of the company.

Manoj Kumar of Corporate Professionals said that although there are such concerns regarding the promoters, most of the time promoter shares are pledged in light of the financial stress of the bankrupt company.

"Existing promoters can also play, obviously, but in most of the cases, their shares are pledged so they cannot sell it and obviously they don't want to be in the light. They might be playing but off-the-book shareholding, if any," he said.

Kumar noted that earlier there was no mention on the sites of the stock exchanges or the brokerage firms that the company is under insolvency, but now the insolvency status of the company is informed on the sites, which is a move in the right direction as it would inform the shareholders and retail investors and they can take a calculated risk.

Regarding the option of suspending trade on the shares of an insolvent company, he said that such a move would be "very harsh because just before the day who might have bought would not have any opportunity to sell".

"It is a dilemma for SEBI," he said.

Experts are also of the view that disclosure of all applications received for acquisition of insolvent companies may also not turn out fruitful as there might be instances in which the applicants are frivolous or bogus.

Therefore, sector experts feel that it is a very tough situation to handle.

"It is a very dicey situation. Nobody knows what will happen ultimately. In some situations company goes into liquidation, some becomes delisted, and some companies majority of these shares are extinguished and minor shares are given to the public shareholders. Still, people want to take risks, there is a dilemma with the regulator," Kumar told IANS.

Companies that are undergoing insolvency with their shares trading on the stock exchanges include Jet Airways, and Jaypee Infratech.

Shares of Jet Airways on the BSE surged over 350 percent in the past year and those of Jaypee Infratech have increased over 100 percent during the period.

Another matter which the Securities and Exchanges Board of India has taken cognisanse of and come up with strict regulations is that regarding public shareholding of companies which have been resolved under IBC.

Last December, the capital market regulator tweaked the minimum public shareholding norms for listed companies facing bankruptcy under the IBC and which get relisted on the stock market.

Now, such companies are mandated to have at least 5 percent public shareholding at the time of their admission to dealing on the stock exchange, as against no minimum requirement earlier.

Earlier, in the case of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) where the public shareholding falls below 10 percent, such listed companies are required to bring the public shareholding to at least 10 percent within a period of 18 months and to 25 percent within 36 months.

Further, such companies are provided 12 months to achieve public shareholding of 10 percent from the date such shares of the company are admitted to dealings on the stock exchange and 36 months to achieve public shareholding of 25 percent.

The lock-in on equity shares allotted to the resolution applicant under the resolution plan shall not be applicable to the extent to achieve 10 percent public shareholding within 12 months.

Concerns were raised after shares of Ruchi Soya a whopping 8,800 percent during January-June last year.

Shares of Orchid Pharma also have been on a dream run as they have surged a mammoth 9,000 percent since their relisting on the exchanges last November, after the company's resolution under the IBC.

  

Top Stories


Leave a Comment

Title: Regulation of insolvent firms' shares still remains a dilemma



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.