Mangaluru: Land Acquisition Bill has become BJP-Congress tug-of-war: Adv Clifton D'Rozario


Daijiworld Media Network - Mangaluru (CLP)

Mangaluru, Jun 9: The Citizens Forum for Mangalore Development organized a discussion on the Land Acquisition Bill with advocate Clifton D’Rozario from Bengaluru at the MBA conference hall, SDM College here on Monday June 8.

Addressing the gathering, advocate Clifton D'Rozario said, "The first Land Acquisition Bill was introduced in 1894 and amended after 120 years. Currently the bill has become a tug-of-war between BJP and congress. Development works cannot be decided by sitting in Delhi. The planning for development has to be done at the grassroot level too."

"The law of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 which was passed had a consent clause and a Social Impact Assessment clause which was a victory to many years of struggle of farmers and various unions. The new law was amended by the BJP government within six months of assuming power. The new ordinance has taken away the main consent clause and Social Impact Assessment clause out of the scene," he said.

"All political parties are trying their best to acquire the land in an easy way. The government says power, highways, housing, defence and infrastructure projects are the five areas which do not require consent. These are the main projects which will acquire vast land and farmers will be affected if the right of the land is taken away from them. In India after independence, around 60% of the land acquired for the defence is still barren. As per the new amendment, even the irrigated land can be taken without consent for the defence," D'Rozario stressed.

"It is high time for all farmers to wake up and organize a district-level meeting and discuss various aspects of the Land Acquisition Bill. If we become lethargic towards it, the victory which we got after many years of struggle through Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 will slip out of our hands," he added.

Deputy commissioner A B Ibrahim said, "Everyone requires power, good roads, good companies but no one is ready to leave their land. In Kerala roads are blocked but people are not ready to give land. The GAIL pipeline project has been stalled due to unwillingness to give up land in Kerala. We choose representatives hoping that they will bring better laws and development, and then we criticize if they do not perform. In the country where population is 120 crores, all cannot take decisions, so we choose representatives, MPs, MLAs etc. If they are not performing it is our fault and not theirs. We should elect good representatives.

"The public is interested in democracy only during elections. People are interested in crime news and sports but no one is interested to read news regarding the government notifications. The citizens have to participate in democracy. NGOs are protesting for all the projects but are not providing any alternative solution. They have failed in their responsibility, along with bureaucracy and the public at large. How many participate in gram sabha meetings? The citizens have to become proactive and participatory in democracy," he concluded.

Superintendent of police Dr S P Sharanappa and assistant commissioner MCC Ashok were also present on the occasion.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • concerned 1, bengaluru

    Wed, Jun 10 2015

    The law should be - those whose land is required by Govt., the land holders affected by it should be relocated and fair compensation made to them before the project commences.
    Otherwise, the owners of land thus taken, will not get compensation for years and may be spend so much money and time to get that compensation which may take years. Relocation may also take a long time until then where will they stay\keep their belongings?
    These things should be settled first and then Govt. may take their own sweet time on the projects.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Katapadi/B'lore

    Wed, Jun 10 2015

    All political parties are anxious to acquire land from the farmers and not interested to give away anything to the deserving.This is really a sorry affair need to fought tooth and nail to bring justice to the poor.

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • sujith noronha, mangalore

    Tue, Jun 09 2015

    Mescom and KPTCL people and Law makers are arrogant in this matter. We want to put one simple case of being land taken away by electricity poles and cables all over the place, no compensation given. They think land is available free of cost. But when it comes to thier land then they try all means to divert the line. Come at Kavoor behind power house we will show u how many lines are passing in our land. God Bless these people.

    DisAgree Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • tresa, Mangalore

    Tue, Jun 09 2015

    In some case i.e GAIL issue I dont agree with the DC because as per our findings, a small stretch of the land is used by the project so either sides are of no value to the land owners. So peoples demand is that you take the whole portion or else divert the pipeline by the government land i.e roadside.Why harass the land owners. Maybe some have only that one piece of land.It is not fair according to me..

    DisAgree [2] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sachidanand Shetty, Mundkur/Dubai

    Tue, Jun 09 2015

    No doubt it’s very painful to give away our ancestor agricultural land (Many people including my family lost few acres of land due to earlier declaration law too) but then same time we should not make complaint about lack of infrastructure, electricity, developments, etc too. I think proper compensation policy should be made it clear and if the acquired land is not utilized for developmental works then it should be return back to ex-owner at free of cost too so that these Politicians may not exercise the right of denotification at later stage. Or instead of acquiring the land, may it should be leased from owner for undefined period as long as it is required for any use so that he is still owner of the land and should be beneficial for both

    DisAgree [1] Agree [17] Reply Report Abuse

  • HENRY MISQUITH, BAHRAIN

    Tue, Jun 09 2015

    Even a sane Democratic Government with absolute majority will not pass such an anti people land bill.

    DisAgree [6] Agree [18] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sachidanand Shetty, Mundkur/Dubai

    Tue, Jun 09 2015

    But Henry Bhai....it was first drafted by none other than Sonia Madam and her cunning team members but now amended because of much demand by various CMs' including our super man Siddu too!!!! Do you know the reason why Investors are going away from Karnataka too???

    DisAgree [29] Agree [13] Reply Report Abuse

  • alfria, mumbai

    Tue, Jun 09 2015

    Sachidanand Shetty, The amended land law bill 2015 was drafted and amended by none others than feku dear friend Adani and Ambani.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [20] Reply Report Abuse

  • avani, mlore

    Tue, Jun 09 2015

    What DC Ibrahim said is 100% correct!

    DisAgree [7] Agree [28] Reply Report Abuse

  • gm, mlur

    Tue, Jun 09 2015

    If the need arises can you give your land?

    DisAgree [10] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Mangaluru: Land Acquisition Bill has become BJP-Congress tug-of-war: Adv Clifton D'Rozario



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.