Latest


Mangaluru: Reasons for acquittal of pub-attack accused to be analyzed - police commissioner

  •   Sat, Mar 17 2018 08:37:14 AM

Daijiworld Media Network - Mangaluru (MS)

Mangaluru, Mar 17: “Public prosecution department has been instructed to analyze the reasons that were responsible for the acquittal of all the accused in the infamous pub-attack case and submit the report,” said T R Suresh, commissioner of police on Friday, March 16.

Third JMFC court in city, on March 12, had acquitted all the accused in the pub-attack case saying that they are innocents due to lack of evidence.

Police commissioner informed that the prosecution department will conduct an inquiry as to whether there is any error or oversight that has happened from the end of the police department during the registration, investigation and charge sheet filing of the said case. He said the prosecution has been asked to submit the report on the same.

Based on the report that will be provided by the prosecution, a decision will be taken as to making an appeal in the high court questioning the judgment given by third JMFC court of Mangaluru.

 
  

Top Stories

Vitu Realty wins Economic Times' ‘Innovative Plot Developer of Year’ award

  •   23 hours ago   

Comment on this article

  • NN, NN

    Sun, Mar 18 2018

    It looks like the entire Pub attack incident was tailored to protect the accused and fool the general public. There was no need for defense lawyer to come out and explain to public why the prosecution lost the case. The defense lawyer is playing safe by speaking from both sides.

    There is a saying which says "Picture speaks thousand words." The prosecution/court should have summoned the photographer and taken his/her testimony. Assuming that the victims are dead due to beatings, the case can be thrown out of court, declare all the accused innocent, simply because there was no testimony from the victims? Law makers should revisit the current court procedures.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Sunil, Dubai

    Sun, Mar 18 2018

    Lack of evidence LOL .100 thousand views in youtube .

    DisAgree [1] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Clifford, Mangalore

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    The reason for acquittal of these criminals was poor charge sheet deliberately filed by police under instructions from then BJP government. We remember Somasekhar commission under BJP. No point holding any enquiries as nothing will come out of this.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [18] Reply Report Abuse

  • HOFZ, MANGALORE - KARNATAKA

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    JUSTICE DENIED FOR WOMEN. BIG KICK BACK FOR JUDGES

    DisAgree [1] Agree [20] Reply Report Abuse

  • SMR, Karkala

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    If the video recording of the 'pub attack' is not an evidence for Judge Manjunath who gave verdict acquitting all the accused, what if terror is going to attack on the same pub caught on the CCTV and cameras is that not enough to prosecute the accused?

    In my view like Ramachandra mutt disciple murder swami acquittal, Namo Naresh getting bail before naroc analysis is clear proof that some powerful local Congress leaders secret understanding with this fanatic organisations. If is the ruling Congress 'soft approach' has brought this day they are reduced few states.
    If no accused coming forward clear says that they might have life threat when law enforcement can't provide their security and for court their absence in witness box means lack of proof.
    By all means Mangalore has lost credibility to become 'smart city' with this incident when the whole world is watched.
    Jai Hind

    DisAgree [3] Agree [23] Reply Report Abuse

  • Beowulf, Mangalore

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    Why bother? let me help by summing up the analysis - Our law enforcement authorities are useless.

    There..... I did it.

    I have no trust left in our police, nor our justice system.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [25] Reply Report Abuse

  • Peace lover, MANGALORE

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    Our law and police is for rich and higher class people. Not for girls, orphans, iIlterates and poor people.

    DisAgree Agree [22] Reply Report Abuse

  • Subhash Pai, Mangalore

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    These qualified IPS officers,Lawyers, Judges, Media and other intellectuals are analyzing why accused cannot be guilty in this incidence only because of lack of evidence? What is the live video? Why they were arrested only those people who were seen in the CC TV and others on their statements? If this would be in any developed country by this time criminals would have completed their punishment and come out from jail. In our country only acquitting took so many years. What a shame.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [25] Reply Report Abuse

  • JNB, Mangalore-Mumbai

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    BY THE TIME SAME JUDGE WILL BE PROMOTED TO HIGH-COURT AND CHANCES OF GETTING JUSTICE VERY VERY VERY LIMITED-EDITION.

    'THERE IS NO RESPECT FOR HONEST OFFICERS WHO DID THEIR JOB'

    DisAgree [2] Agree [21] Reply Report Abuse

  • Samantha Lewis, Mangalore/Dubai

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    There is no sense of installing the CC TV cameras. 21st century we are in this state and dreaming Digital India.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [39] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ronald D, Udupi

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    Appreciate concerns of police commissioner as a reciprocation to public anger that criminals have walked free despite video clips of heinous attack on pub goers that to young women! Every one above desired age by law has every right to visit the pub, restaurant or any entertainment place they wish! When we go to a bar / restaurant / shop we will not ask for their licence ...do we??? Not even one out of thousand. There are government appointed institution and inspectors to check the same!
    Pub attackers must get punishment and jail for at last one year so that future gundas of such type may think twice before attacking any women! I pity those people and political party supporters approve such third grade rowdy behavior!

    DisAgree [1] Agree [20] Reply Report Abuse

  • Monty Dotor, Mangalore

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    Trial by activists and public cannot influence trial by Courts. On the contrary it is counterproductive. Hard documentary evidence has to be produced in Courts. Was any medical examination done to prove grievous injury in the first place?

    DisAgree [6] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Bengaluru/Katapadi

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    Action need to be taken swiftly because this is a long pending sensitive issue effecting the society

    DisAgree [1] Agree [39] Reply Report Abuse

  • bharath1953, Mangalore

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    The instructions from the Police Commissioner to analyse the filed and submitted report to the Judiciary shall not diffuse the anger from the public and will effect Congress Governments sincerity. After the Election every body will try to forget the incident.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [16] Reply Report Abuse

  • Yogi Shettigar, Kateel

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    Wow! every one worry about pub attack ,but no one think how George escaped from Ganapathi case..politics bhai politics...

    DisAgree [44] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • CHRISTINE, MANGALORE

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    Ganapathy belongs to a Police Department who has to save life, committed suiside. He killed himself. He had many ways to prove that he was facing harrasement.

    In Pub attack girls were iltreated, that too outside girls who came for studies. Parents after this attach took children to their place though they paid huge fees for education. Group of boys attacking girls what a great crime. What a great shame on these boys.

    At the same time name of our District also spoiled due to these boys.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [35] Reply Report Abuse

  • bharath1953, Mangalore

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    Dear Christine, educated Girls are ill treated, Their Parents have sent them to study here in Mangalore, not to do research in a Pub, where you find these spoiled brats smoking , drinking and dancing. Their Parents were ashamed so they did not bring them to the witness box, that is how the the vigilantes were acquitted.

    DisAgree [14] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • CHRISTINE, MANGALORE

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    I agree with you Bharath 1953. Being girls they should not do that. They came for study they had to study.

    But do you know very well the boys who went to attach girls in the pub are clean hearted. Came from good family. They are not drinking alchohol and not smoking. If they are so good why they judge other people. Why they went to see them. Who given authority to beat young girls. Why they bother about others.

    Command them to correct whole Indian girls and boys. Let India become people who are all good people.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [13] Report Abuse

  • I wish I was there, Bahrain

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    Failing to indict a criminal the sitting judge sends a clear message that he/she is in power and are above the law, it is because of these criminal that so many girls were beaten in public and put to shame everything was caught on camera is the court blind, the people who are saying that there is no evidence.
    Criminals should be punished, and not fed pastries and treated like hero's

    DisAgree Agree [37] Reply Report Abuse

  • PKS, Udupi

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    problem is with investigative agencies and the prosecution team. Proescution along with investigative agency should make a water tight case. Here both work in difference directions either due to the order of the political masters or the influence of defense team over the prosecution team. Same is happened in 2G scam and the telephone exchange (Maran Brothers) in CBI court. Judge during pronouncement of judgement said that he was waiting for the evidence to be submitted by the prosecution. Why can't the judge highlight or pass a remark during the proceeding instead of acquit them due of lack of evidence.

    DisAgree Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • jeevan, kudla

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    Reason is simple
    Judiciary is not biased to entertain political vendetta cases filled by dongi congi govt.

    DisAgree [60] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jenifer, Mangalore

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    Jeevan,

    I've told you, you opinion will die down when your generation ends. The next one will not listen to you because the Sabbarwal's have already proven it.

    Its nothing but you are a generation behind, A small gathering in a pub is no more than a routine when the next generation comes up. If all were to cling on to culture and traditions, nobody would have been wearing trousers/shirt/blazer today, instead they would have been moving about in Dhoti-Jubba.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [40] Reply Report Abuse

  • Beowulf, Mangalore

    Sun, Mar 18 2018

    Jenifer,

    Very good reply. Fools need to be told truth.

    DisAgree [1] Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Manohar, Mangalore

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    You are far behind.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [5] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mangalurian, Mangaluru

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    An analysis, regardless of who conducts it, is merely an academic exercise.

    Other than an output of a report, it has no impact on the law and order situation.

    The bottom-line here is that the criminals have escaped, despite committing various crimes.

    According to the Bristish laws, which Indians have adopted, a crime committed by someone is automatically considered a crime against the society and the state, and not against the party affected.

    So, the affected party (victim) does not have to be present to decide if the crime has taken place or not.

    An analysis is best left to the media. Police will be wasting their time on such an exercise.

    DisAgree Agree [28] Reply Report Abuse

  • AMAR NATHAL, MANGALORE

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    Analysis would be done after elections. Until then paralysis of justice.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [28] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Sat, Mar 17 2018

    New Rules of Admissibility as per Anvar P.V vs P.K.Basheer & Ors
    As stated before the Supreme Court in Anvar has now overruled the position in law as in State v. Navjot Sandhu. The Court has now held that any documentary evidence in the form of an electronic record can be proved only in accordance with the procedure prescribed under Section 65B of the Evidence Act.
    To reach this conclusion the Court reasoned that Section 65B of the Evidence Act has been inserted by way of an amendment by the Information Technology Act, 2000. Inasmuch it is a special provision which governs digital evidence and will override the general provisions with respect to adducing secondary evidence under the Evidence Act.
    The Court further goes on to hold that provisions such as Section 45A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 which provide for the opinion of examiner of electronic evidence can only be availed once the provisions of Section 65B are satisfied. Hence compliance with Section 65B is now mandatory for persons who intend to rely upon emails, websites or any electronic record in a civil or criminal trial to which provisions of the Evidence Act are applicable.
    We have electronic evidence ...

    DisAgree [11] Agree [34] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Mangaluru: Reasons for acquittal of pub-attack accused to be analyzed - police commissioner



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.

You might also like