Former NSE CEO challenges PC Act definitions in Delhi HC


New Delhi, Nov 10 (IANS): Chitra Ramkrishna, ex-CEO of the National Stock Exchange (NSE), has filed a plea in the Delhi High Court challenging the definitions of 'public duty' and 'public servant' under the Prevention of Corruption Act (PC Act).

A division bench of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Shalinder Kaur has sought response from the Central government and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), setting the hearing for December 19.

Ramkrishna has contested Sections 2(b) and 2(c)(viii) of the PC Act, arguing that they are overly broad and could wrongly implicate individuals not serving public roles.

An accused in the NSE co-location scam, Ramkrishna faces allegations of manipulating employee designations and compensation.

Senior advocate N. Hariharan, representing Ramkrishna, said that these definitions unfairly extend to private individuals, emphasising NSE's private company status under the Companies Act.

Hariharan also questioned the validity of the prosecution sanction, contending it lacks proper justification. He argued that quashing the sanction would jeopardise the special court's jurisdiction, a sentiment countered by CBI counsel Anupam S. Sharma.

Sharma cited a Supreme Court precedent, stating that even a "sprinkle of aid" from the government can classify organisation employees as public servants.

The court has asked both the parties to submit written arguments.

 

  

Top Stories


Leave a Comment

Title: Former NSE CEO challenges PC Act definitions in Delhi HC



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.