Udupi: Court refuses bail in two POCSO cases


Daijiworld Media Network - Udupi (SP)

Udupi, Jun 9: Principal district and sessions judge, T Venkatesh Naik, who also is the district judge of special court for cases under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), has rejected bail applications of the accused in two POCSO cases.

The first one relates to sexual atrocity on a minor girl on January 19 this year by her neighbour, Anand (20). In this case, the case under POCSO had been filed in Kavoor police station, Mangaluru. In this case, the accused had escorted the 17-year-old girl living in his neighbourhood, for a religious programme arranged at the house of his elder sister at Perampalli within Manipal police station limits. On January 19, when no one was a round, he had developed physical relationship with the girl, resulting in her pregnancy. This case filed by the girl's parents was later transferred to Manipal station from Kavoor police station.

In this case, the girl expressed her readiness to marry the accused. But the judge rejected the bail application on the ground that the girl was minor when she was raped.

In the other case, Sridhar Naik (24) had cajoled the minor daughter of his aunt to agree to have sex with him during May 2016. This had happened in Kudoor in Kundapur taluk. In this case, investigation had been completed and charge sheet had been filed.

The advocate argued for bail for the accused, duly telling the court that the two  are relatives and will marry in future. But the judge quashed the bail application. In both the cases, district special public prosecutor for POCSO cases, Vijaya Vasu Poojary had represented the prosecution.

  

Top Stories


Leave a Comment

Title: Udupi: Court refuses bail in two POCSO cases



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.