US lawmakers concerned over curb on Christian charity in India


Washington, Dec 7 (PTI): Top American lawmakers today expressed concern over the alleged curbs imposed by India on a Christian charity organisation whose representatives appeared before a Congressional hearing seeking change in New Delhi's policies related to foreign funding of NGOs.

"It is my hope that by bringing attention to this issue, as we're doing here today, the 145,000 children will not be tragically denied the services they desperately need, and that American families....can continue to send the USD38 a month for food and education fees to the poorest of the poor," Congressman Ed Royce, Chairman of the powerful House Foreign Relations Committee said in his opening remarks.

Royce joined by other lawmakers and representations of human rights bodies and Compassion International (CI) -- the Christian charity organisation which is often accused of being engaged in religious conversions in India -- rued that the recent effort to regulate foreign funding and enforce taxation laws has made it impossible for them to carry out work among poor children in India.

"In India, it (CI) is the single largest contributor of aid for children living in extreme poverty," Royce said. "We have spent nine months and hundreds of hours dealing with the Indian bureaucracy on this, and it looks like the bureaucracy is trying to run out the clock," Royce said.
Compassion International says in 2011, the Indian government made significant changes to the Foreign Contribution Regulation Act (FCRA), which is the law that regulates NGOs' receipt of foreign funds into the country.

The Indian Government has asserted that its policies initiated in 2011 is not aimed at one particular NGO. Congressman Eliot Engel, Ranking Member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said he has been concerned by reports that NGOs are having difficulty registering and operating in India.

"Civil society plays a pivotal role in democracy, holding government accountable and standing up for the rights of marginalised groups. So it's troubling that a country with such a long tradition of an empowered and active civil society might be going down this path," he said.

"We cannot avoid the hard questions or avoid discussions simply because they are difficult conversations to have. This is how democracies work, warts and all," he added.

Testifying before the committee, Stephen Oakley, general counsel and vice president of the General Counsel Office at Compassion International, alleged that the Home Ministry and the Income Tax Department are harassing NGOs like his which are engaged in charity works among poor children.
"Most recently, MHA (Ministry of Home Affairs) has prevented the return of USD 330,000 in aid that Compassion attempted to transfer to its Indian partners. The money cannot be received by the intended partner in India or returned to Compassion. This low-level harassment and intimidation by MHA is widespread and not limited to Compassion," Oakley alleged.

"While Indian government has wrongly accused Compassion of engaging in illegal conversions and anti-national activity, it has simultaneously ignored and violated its own laws," he alleged.

"MHA knows that they can use the inefficiency and massive delays of the Indian bureaucracy as a weapon - forcing charities like Compassion to either accept their determinations, or spend years seeking redress in a painfully slow and often corrupt legal system. In short, India`s Home Ministry is using those aspects of India's bureaucracy, which are most in need of urgent reform, to systematically target NGOs with agendas and views that differ from its own," Oakley said.

John Sifton, Asia policy director Human Rights Watch, alleged that a troubling new crackdown on civil society is underway in India, especially in the last few months.

A large number of NGOs have faced increasing governmental harassment including intrusive and politically motivated legal scrutiny, and the US government - a close ally - needs to respond, he urged members of the Congress. Sifton said the US government should raise concerns about the FCRA more publicly.

"US officials should also urge (Prime Minister Narendra) Modi to end government harassment of NGOs, while encouraging him to ask parliament to amend the FCRA to only regulate corruption and deprive the Home Ministry authority to block funding for NGOs," he said.

Irfan Nooruddin professor Georgetown University in his testimony said, "This incident is consistent with a broader trend affecting many NGOs and nonprofits in India which are increasingly complaining of heavy-handed government regulation in what has led many social observers to raise alarms about an attack on civil society by the current government. Such alarmism is not entirely misguided but it is overblown.

"In enforcing the regulations of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act (FCRA), the Government of India is acting fully within its rights as a sovereign state, and the reality is that a great many of the organisations that have lost their licenses since May 2014 were in violation of FCRA regulations, he said.

"But it is also arguably true that many have violated the letter rather than the spirit of the law, and that the enforcement has been too often opaque and without clear explanation of cause. Further, while concerns that the Government of India has targeted faith- based Christian organisations disproportionately cannot be confirmed without more systematic analysis, anecdotal evidence does suggest that such concerns are not without warrant," Nooruddin said.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • shuba, Mumbai

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    Charity begins from home. Our Christian brothern we can see they help irrespective of religion in every field. If the present government is opposing the help given from overseas then certainly they cannot see the good things done which may not be shown as a merit or useful in their vote banking column

    DisAgree [2] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • sid, mangalore

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    Let there be charity with proper paper work .

    DisAgree [3] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Shankar, Mangalore

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    Now that there are ample opportunities in US to serve the poor and rejected, the NGOs can concentrate on their on countries rather trying to do charity in India.
    The number of homeless, refugees from both mexico and and middle east, and the rejected humans from corporates after the recession -all these need charity and support.

    DisAgree [9] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Juliana, udupi

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    Poor people of India can not forget the help they received from other countries during the need. Now India is self reliant and feed its citizens in need and more facilities provided to the poor day by day to make them lead independent life.

    DisAgree [7] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • Valerian D Souza, Udupi / Mumbai

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    WHY DEPRIVE THE SUPPORT TO 145,000 POOR children they desperately need, and that American families provide?
    Why this anti poor law which is against the law of God?
    Law of God exhorts the rich to support the poor, needy and most neglected sections of the society.

    DisAgree [11] Agree [32] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    The real problem is Christians do not vote for BJP ...

    DisAgree [20] Agree [52] Reply Report Abuse

  • moshu, Managalore

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    Exactly. Zakir Naik also has to say a similar line.

    DisAgree [9] Agree [23] Reply Report Abuse

  • Alex, Mangalore

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    India should understand that it was American charities, with CARE, CARITAS and OXFAM helped India to relieve hunger and famine of the 1960s until mid 1970s, when India had no food grains to feed the hungry Indians.
    I remember the days, with the help of these charities, we got wheat, corn, milk powder and edible oil.

    DisAgree [14] Agree [50] Reply Report Abuse

  • Richard, Shirva/Sharjah

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    @ you should also remember our great PM Shashtri rejected US food grains during war time and told people to prepare to face and to self reliant...which worked later ..see now..don't want charity which disturbs our people in large!!

    DisAgree [23] Agree [28] Reply Report Abuse

  • Peter, KSA

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    People who earn in Gulf countries do not want charity. However, people who are in remote area can not afford to buy Dal for Rs. 150.00 per Kg. Beef banned, mutton is out of reach @ Rs. 600.00 per Kg. If at all we do not need charity from USA, please donate part of your earning to your fellow countrymen who are struggling to survive.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [44] Reply Report Abuse

  • Valerian D Souza, Udupi / Mumbai

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    Richard,
    Big corporates like Reliance should have taken over all charitable work the others do, at least to Indians!

    DisAgree [1] Agree [32] Reply Report Abuse

  • Harold D'cunha, Mangalore, India

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    Valerian D Souza, Udupi / Mumbai

    What charity, one is doing to others is more important than advising others to do the same.
    charity to others by individuals, will cost oneself some pain & requires sacrifice where as advising others to do charity will not cost any thing.

    DisAgree [7] Agree [3] Report Abuse

  • Valerian D Souza, Udupi / Mumbai

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    Harold, my comment is to people who advocate others to stop charity!
    Before stopping the present donors they should find others!

    DisAgree [1] Agree [9] Report Abuse

  • Alex, Mangalore

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    But who poisoned Mr. Lal Bahadur Shastri, was it not an Inside job of Indians itself?
    Indians give long and glossy speeches but do little to help downtrodden, only to add "zeroes" to the bank balances, greed without any end in sight, a rare species on this mother earth.

    DisAgree [3] Agree [17] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mohammed, Bajpe/Riyadh

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    Why is this organization so concerned about India were Catholics have special prevliges as minorities. Why don't they visit other countries like Iraq, Egypt, Syria, Pak were Christians are minorities and face all sort of sufferings like Rape, sex slave,child labor, massacre etc? They have to visit these countries if they are so concerned.

    DisAgree [57] Agree [39] Reply Report Abuse

  • John Tauro, M'luru / Kwt

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    Many European and US NGOs are active in the countries you had mentioned plus Afghanistan and Yemen, providing selfless services, risking their lives. I hope you are aware of an Indian priest who was abducted in Yemen.

    DisAgree [12] Agree [45] Reply Report Abuse

  • Cynthia, Moodbidri

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    Hope American government question Mahan modi and showi modi how Hindus enjoy equal rightsl in USA and Christians are terrorized in India

    DisAgree [31] Agree [58] Reply Report Abuse

  • David Pais, Mangalore

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    modi govt. thinks christian ngo's r terrorists get funds from abroad.

    DisAgree [20] Agree [60] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ammi, Mangalore

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    At least Christian NGO's have support from US law makers but poor Zakir Naik's NGO doesn't have.

    DisAgree [40] Agree [26] Reply Report Abuse

  • steven, dxb

    Wed, Dec 07 2016

    Zakir is religious preacher and here these NGO's working among poors

    DisAgree Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: US lawmakers concerned over curb on Christian charity in India



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.