Lodha panel recommends separate BCCI, IPL governing bodies


New Delhi, Jan 4 (IANS): The Justice R.M. Lodha Committee on Monday proposed separate governing bodies for the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) and the Indian Premier League (IPL) in a bid to partially segregate their functioning, while also suggesting a one-state-one-member pattern for the board.

Submitting its report to the Supreme Court, the three-member committee comprising its former chief justice, Justice Lodha, as also Justice Ashok Bhan and Justice R.V. Raveendran - former judges of the apex court - suggested reforms in the Indian cricket board and announced a slew of measures, among them that the IPL governing body should be of nine members with the secretary and the treasurer of the BCCI as its ex-officio members.

Two other members of the IPL governing council will be nominated or elected by the full members. Of the remaining five, two will be the nominees of franchises, one will be a representative of the players association (that is to be formed) and one will a nominee of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India.

Among other key recommendations, the panel stressed that one representation for one state is a fair idea and one association of each state will be a full member of the BCCI and have a right to vote. Other members from a state, or those without territory or competitive presence -- Services, Railways, CCI, NCC -- were relegated to associate status without voting rights in the BCCI.

The Lodha panel also recommended the appointment of a Chief Executive Officer (CEO) to manage the day-to-day affairs of the BCCI. The CEO will be assisted by six professional managers. The Lodha panel said the CEO and his managers will be responsible to an apex council that will be comprised of nine members -- five elected, two representatives of players association, and one woman.

The Lodha committee has also sought to put some restrictions on the BCCI office-bearers: they should not be aged more than 70, should not be ministers or government servants - and cannot hold office for more than three terms, with a a "cooling-off" period between terms.

Lodha reckoned that a robust agent registration system would safeguard players. There will be a steering committee to include former star all-rounder Mohinder Amarnath, former India women's captain Diana Eduljee, and legendary leg-spinner and former Test skipper Anil Kumble. They will take up matter with BCCI for formation of players’ association in light of suggestions from the report.

Lodha said the panel prepared an extensive questionnaire and interviewed several BCCI office bearers, stakeholders in Indian cricket, former national captains, including Bishan Singh Bedi, Kapil Dev, Sourav Ganguly, Sachin Tendulkar, Rahul Dravid and Kumble to finalise its report.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Sachidanand Shetty, Mundkur/Dubai

    Tue, Jan 05 2016

    Whatever is the recommendation!!!! But who cares in BCCI or IPL???? Instead they will increase their Political Party Membership numbers very soon and argue that cricket players should be kept out instead!!!!

    DisAgree Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • stan, dubai

    Mon, Jan 04 2016

    Lodha panel recommendation are good move.... specially office-bearers: they should not be aged more than 70, should not be ministers or government servants, and maximum 2 terms in the office... Please do this rule with out politicians than only our young and able people will come in politics.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Vincent Rodrigues, Promenade Road,Fraze Town,B'lore 560005

    Mon, Jan 04 2016

    Better suggestion to keep the politicians out of sports to retain better control and corruption.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ren, Dubai

    Mon, Jan 04 2016

    Why Lodha Panel is not recommending position for ex cricketers to have prominent place in the administration of the game in which they were actively involved. Why all politicians and businessmen who don’t know even how to hold cricket bat properly should be involved in top positions and play with the careers of talented cricketers

    DisAgree [1] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Mon, Jan 04 2016

    Should Jaitley be SACKED ...

    DisAgree [2] Agree [9] Reply Report Abuse

  • willie, Mangalore

    Mon, Jan 04 2016

    Yes, Yes, Yes by all means at the first opportunity.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sachidanand Shetty, Mundkur/Dubai

    Tue, Jan 05 2016

    So what about Shukla????

    DisAgree Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jacob Mendonsa, Bangalore

    Tue, Jan 05 2016

    Sachidanand/Jossy

    Not only Jaitley, Shukla but also we don't want Sharad Power, Abdulla Fakhroo & Scindias etc.

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • willie, Mangalore

    Tue, Jan 05 2016

    Sack all the fat cows who are good for nothing

    DisAgree Agree [1] Report Abuse

  • vnayak, mangalore/switzerland

    Mon, Jan 04 2016

    Great report. This means that Gujarat and Maharashtra will have only one vote instead of three each as now. BCCI will protest,but who cares? RTI will be important. I am glad that Mohinder Amarnath has been brought to the forefront though BCCI has been ignoring him always.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Lodha panel recommends separate BCCI, IPL governing bodies



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.