Sexual harassment: Advocate from Karnataka barred from entering SC premises


Daijiworld Media Network

New Delhi, Apr 23: In a historic move taken for the first time, the Supreme Court has barred entry of an advocate into the premises of the Supreme Court for six months. This decision was taken after going through investigation report on the allegation of sexual harassment made against the advocate concerned.

C S Nagesh, who hails from Karnataka, has earned the dubious distinction of facing the said ban for the first time from the Supreme Court. A Gender Sensitization and Internal Complaints Committee (GSICC) had probed the complaint of sexual harassment against the lawyer and submitted its report.

The report had recommended for placing a ban of one year on the advocate, but the Chief Justice of India, P Sadashivam, said that relaxation in the period of ban was considered in view of the fact that this step is being taken for the first time ever.

‘The report of GSICC was accepted unanimously on March 4, 2014. As this is the first instance of such an allegation against an advocate, we have showed lenience,’ the CJI said. In his March 15 order, the CJI has advised the advocate to introspect on what he had done. The registrar of the Supreme Court also issued a circular relating to this incident.

The Supreme Court had constituted GSICC last year to look into complaints of sexual harassment at work place.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • c.s.nagesh, newdelhi

    Sat, May 30 2015


    STING OPERATION AGAINST GSICC,SUPREME COURT
    Incredible Truth Poetic Research Sting Operation
    Magical Poetry's sting operation is par with the artificial sting operations of the media people.In the magical poetry sting operation every thing is natural,not an artificial oneno deliberate sting operational endeavor like media sting operations in the poetic sting operation. A Poetic genre of sting operation.
    For the sting purpose a complaint was made before the GSIC Committee, Supreme Court and FIR 54/2014 under section 506 IPC and 66A IT Act at Tilak Marg police station against me by my she-friend advocate Allegations were twisted/framed [of course naturally] as so i committed by my she-friend out of my poetry and research [1000 SMSes]notes, at GSICC and FIR as well. On 21/02/2014 my statement of mine was recorded before the [video record]committee.As per the poetry's sting operation mine is the role of a multiple faced invisible mirror. Supreme court debarred me for 6 months. On 23/03/2014, allover India, leading news papers, tv media,legal websites and also e-papers published/reported my debarred news. More than 50 websites reported my debarred news and Legally India,a popular legal website only published my response, in detail, to my incidence.
    *************************************************************************************
    Sting Operation [Research] by Magical Realistic Poems against the members of GSICC Committee, Supreme Court,Judge of a criminal court,Police :
    *************************************************************************************
    Gender Sensitization and Internal Complainant Committee,Supreme Court[GSICC]
    All of a sudden if any read the stuff hereto relay can not understand what i am placed before general public OR it may give astonishing insight into the beneath. However we are in the time of God Particle researchfollowing reading may not be appeared unbelievable too. While traverse through please be with your scientific and psychological critic angle.
    1].GSICC: Register of Supreme Court Ms.Rachana caused acid attack on one Ms.Rachana, delhi[feb 2014 all Medias,Asian Age mentioned the name of the victim as 'Rachana'. [21/02/2014 was the day of my video statement before the committee]
    2].Lady Lawyer[one of the members of the gsicc,Ms.Indu Molhthra] caused acid attack on a Lady Lawyer[feb2014 in all news papers]
    3] Mr.Nageswra Rao[membr gsicc] caused death of the cine actor Sri.Nageshwara Rao. at Andra [ 22nd,January 2014]
    4] Ms.Swathi katiyr Magistrate,patiyala court no 32 caused the death of one Ms. Swathi in twin bomb blast in train at seat no23 at Channi[in all news papers on 1st may 2014]
    5] Ms.Bharti Ali,at Alighar [out side member to GSICC,cased lady judge's attempt to rape case by G.Gupta and P.Gupta.[on 04/06/2014,reported in all news papers]
    6] Mr.Amar police Inspector and Mr. Sundeep police caused to fire[who filed FIR no 54/2014 of tilak marg police station in the c

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • SUNDAR KARITHOTA , HALEANGADI

    Wed, Apr 23 2014

    Some professionals, especially Lawyers, Doctors,Hospitals, Police Officials, Astrologers are taking advantage of the situation. People should be alert and oppose their misdoings by legal actions.

    DisAgree Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • Mann, bangalore

    Wed, Apr 23 2014

    The SC should not have shown leniency in this first instance itself. It sends a wrong message.
    The courts are there to effect maximum sentences for wrong doers and leniency to criminals\wrong doers.
    Have the SC set a precedent by doing so?
    CJI P.Sadashivam's act is questionable.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [4] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rosario Fernandes, Kallianpur

    Wed, Apr 23 2014

    I am sure Ram Jethmalani's pants
    wet.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • Diva, Mangalore

    Wed, Apr 23 2014

    pleasant to hear..

    What about other Naga..s at other premises

    DisAgree [1] Agree [10] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ramesh K, Mangalore

    Wed, Apr 23 2014

    Ban only six months.What if Nag makes busss... after 6 months? Any snake charmer available?

    DisAgree [1] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • CONRAD JOHN TAURO, SHIRVA/UDUPI/DUBAI

    Wed, Apr 23 2014

    Black Coat With Black Deed.

    DisAgree Agree [26] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Sexual harassment: Advocate from Karnataka barred from entering SC premises



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.