Unease grows among US doctors over quality of Indian medicines


New York, March 18 (Reuters) : Some US doctors are becoming concerned about the quality of generic drugs supplied by Indian manufacturers following a flurry of recalls and import bans by the Food and Drug Administration.

India supplies about 40 percent of generic and over-the-counter drugs used in the United States, making it the second-biggest supplier after Canada.

In recent months, the FDA, citing quality control problems ranging from data manipulation to sanitation, has banned the importation of products from Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd , Wockhardt Ltd and, most recently, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd .


"I'm just beginning to realize the gravity of the problem," said Dr Steven Nissen, head of cardiology at the Cleveland Clinic. "It's terrible and it is starting to get a lot of traction among physicians."

Indian drugmakers are by no means the only companies to recall products or be warned by the FDA about manufacturing problems. For instance, quality control failures at Johnson & Johnson forced the company to recall dozens of products over the past five years, ranging from artificial hips to children's Tylenol.

And last year, Germany's Boehringer Ingelheim said it would shut down its US contract manufacturing unit, Ben Venue Laboratories, after it was cited for repeated manufacturing violations that led to shortages of the cancer drug Doxil.

India's drugmakers, a $14 billion industry, reject any criticism that their products are inferior to drugs made in other countries.

"We have heard doctors making generalized statements, without being specific on any product or company," said D G Shah, Secretary General of the Indian Pharmaceutical Alliance, a trade group representing large Indian drugmakers. "This is a deliberate and serious campaign to malign the Indian generic industry."

If US doctors come across a medicine that does not meet quality standards, they should report it to regulators, he said. "Doctors are not in a position to judge whether manufacturing processes are correct or not. That is the US FDA's job."

Generic drugs account for nearly 85 percent of medicines prescribed in the United States and the government is relying on them to help rein in healthcare costs.

"We are losing control over what people are swallowing," said Dr Harry Lever, a cardiologist at the Cleveland Clinic who is trying raise awareness of the matter among US lawmakers. "Now, when a patient comes in who is not doing well, the first thing I do is look at their drugs and find out who makes it."

Increasingly, Lever said, he is recommending patients seek out generic drugs from specific manufacturers outside India.

"I'm tending to stay away from India," he said. "There's something wrong. Too many things are happening."

INDIAN DOCTORS HIT BACK

Indian physicians do not share the concerns.

"Our drugs are being sold in many countries and being accepted, so we have no issues," said Narendra Saini, Secretary General of the Indian Medical Association, a voluntary body of 215,000 doctors. "How do I know that western drugs are better than our drugs?"

A 2012 report by India's Parliament alleged collusion between pharmaceutical firms and officials at the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO), the country's drugs regulator, and described an agency that was both understaffed and underqualified.

Saini said physicians trust that the CDSCO is taking care of the quality and the standard of the drugs made in India.

"We very much trust those medicines," he added.

Representatives of Ranbaxy, Sun and Wockhardt were not immediately available to comment.

Dr Joel Zonszein, director of the Clinical Diabetes Center at Montefiore Medical Center in New York, said he is concerned about the quality of generic drugs in general, not just those from India. He cited, as an example, his experience with the diabetes drug metformin.

"When patients open the bottle of medication it smells like dead fish," he said. Zonszein did not know which company made the foul-smelling drug.

Physicians do not have a say in which generic drug a patient receives, as that depends on which products are stocked by individual pharmacies. If a patient wants to avoid a certain manufacturer, he or she may have to change pharmacies.

Doctors may specify that the branded version of a drug be dispensed, but insurance companies frequently refuse to pay for them.

Dr Richard Kovacs, who heads a number of American College of Cardiology committees and sits on its board of trustees, said doctors may need to play a greater role monitoring the medications prescribed by their practices.

"The average US cardiologist has been able to assume that the drugs were safe and effective. It now appears we need to be more vigilant as a profession, and assist the FDA by reporting cases where we are concerned about irregularities in the drugs supplied to our patients," he said.

HARD TO KEEP UP

FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg, who recently returned from her first official visit to India, is urging greater collaboration between the two countries. During her visit, the FDA and India's Ministry of Health and Family Welfare signed a statement of intent to cooperate to prevent the distribution of unsafe drugs.

Shortly afterwards, India's drug controller general, G.N. Singh, said in an interview that the country will follow its own quality standards.

"The FDA may regulate its country, but it can't regulate India on how India has to behave or how to deliver," he said.

Some companies seem to be responding to the FDA's actions.

Piyush Nahar, an analyst with Jefferies India Private Ltd who recently met with a number of Indian drugmakers, said in a recent report that most companies "have increased their investment" in compliance and some are considering investing in U.S. or European facilities "to overcome challenges relating to both regulations and perceptions."

The array of recalls and warning letters can be dizzying.

Ranbaxy recently recalled more than 64,000 bottles of a generic cholesterol-lowering drug after doses were mixed up in a bottle, and Sun began recalling 2,528 bottles of a diabetes drug after a bottle was found to contain an epilepsy treatment.

Those mix-ups follow a recall in January by Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd of more than 58,000 bottles of its heartburn drug lansoprazole due to a microbial contamination.

"It's hard to be sure on a day-to-day basis with the array of medications that you have to be potentially aware of that there's a specific problem with a specific medication from a specific generic manufacturer," said Dr. Elliott Antman, a cardiologist at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston.

The medical community is dependent on agencies such as the FDA, he added. "The bottom line for me is we have to make sure they have sufficient resources to do their job correctly."

To Dr Jason Gaglia, a diabetes expert at the Joslin Diabetes Center in Boston, the warning letters and import bans indicate the FDA is doing its job.

"Is it scary? Yes. But to me it means the system is working," he said.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Rita, Germany

    Tue, Mar 18 2014

    What the officials say in America about the deficiency of good control of medicine is true.and here also is the same.afterall it is human beings ,not any animal's health.I too will not Keep quite if my or my relatives get such wrong medicine and get either die or disability.all are same.Good that they brought to the notice of Controllers.we Indians should concentrate on complains coming to the notice and try to find out and try to make it better instead of defending of our faultlt.only so we can win Export and our good Name .Otherwise, we will loose our Name for good.Take the example of China who try betterment when the complaint arises.many a times in indias articles found lot of pesticides ,cheap  material which west doesn't accept.And I heard in the media many a times row materials for medicines are not available from india in time.that is not good .cancer patients Need their therapy in time and accurately.

    DisAgree [1] Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Naveen Sequeira, Mangalore

    Tue, Mar 18 2014

    Rudolf,
    In US and other Western countries, there are specific laws that compensate the victims of bad drugs. If you search online, you can find out the amount compensation paid to some victims VIOXX recall is a good example. In India, we don't have any laws that compensate the victims. We still elect un-educated, corrupt, criminal goons to make the laws of the land. What else can we expect from them!!!

    DisAgree Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rudolf, Mumbai

    Tue, Mar 18 2014

    I agree Naveen, but my say was the same cos. which paid crores of rupees compensation in class action suits to those affected in the US are only offering to give only a replacement of the particular product!!

    Lot many unwanted drugs are introduced into the medical system which have dangerous side effects, when simple, natural remedies with same effect are available, compared to the beneficial effects which rake in billions of dollars in revenues for them, on example is statins, which I think almost each and every Indian who can afford modern medicine in and in his 40s would be having in his medicine chest!!! Jai Hind!!

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Anilkumar, Mangalore

    Tue, Mar 18 2014

    This can be one more stunt by US just to put down Indian Products. A country which has blindly accepted substandard Chinese products, allowing people to swallow anything that comes from China, is now Generalising and attacking all Indian drugs just because of the few cases which may have skipped the attention of controlling people or may be contradictory.

    Such discrimination will not hold good in a court of law.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Chris, New York

    Tue, Mar 18 2014

    To Anilkumar: So a recall by 3 Indian companies of 64,000, 58,000 and 3,000 bottles of pills (recalled by companies themselves, not the FDA) somehow means this is an American 'stunt'? Please explain how that makes sense. Also, when Chinese companies make a mistake they acknowledge it and do everything they can to fix it. With Indian companies they simply complain that big bad America and the West are being unfair. Stand up and take responsibility for your mistakes. If you want to be treated like a first world country start acting like it and stop complaining how hard it is when the big boys treat you so mean.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rudolf, Mumbai

    Tue, Mar 18 2014

    Accepted, But what about their cos. manufacturing and supplying defective medicines and other supplies!! Recently DePuy (a subsidiary of J and J) accepted for having supplied thousands of defective hip joints which have caused unimaginable physical pain and financial losses to those who trusted in their products!! They have compensated their citizens heavily for the mistake, but our people who suffered after using them have been left in the lurch!!

    In 2012 a French co. was found to have supplied seriously defective breast implants many of which were used for breast augmentation in India....and the list goes on...

    Recently as per Science Recorder: Pfizer has recalled antidepressants after Tikosyn capsule discovered in the bottle.....

    DisAgree [3] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Unease grows among US doctors over quality of Indian medicines



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.