Parties oppose ordinance on convicted lawmakers


New Delhi, Sep 25 (IANS): A range of political parties, including the Left and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), Wednesday opposed an ordinance that negates a Supreme Court order disqualifying members of parliament and legislatures convicted in a criminal case.

The government opted for the ordinance route Tuesday after a bill on the same issue could not be passed in the monsoon session of parliament.

Terming the step "uncalled for", senior BJP leader Yashwant Sinha said: "The government stands condemned in the eyes of the people of the country for taking this unconstitutional and immoral route."

He said: "If the government had any reservations on that order, it should go back to the Supreme Court and ask it to review it."

"In this case, I would say that (review) also may not be necessary because we are all faced with declining standards in politics and criminalisation of politics, and it should be the combined duty of all of us to ensure that this is stopped," Sinha told a news channel.

Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Sushma Swaraj tweeted: "Union cabinet has approved an ordinance on convicted MPs. We are opposed to this. We request the president not to sign this ordinance."

CPI-M leader Sitaram Yechury said that at an all-party meeting convened to discuss the issue, it was decided that if somebody has been convicted in a lower court, it is possible that he gets reprieve from the higher court.

"But, we had said there should be a discussion and the matter should be brought before parliament," he said.

Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Manish Sisodia said: "We will not give any ticket to any corrupt leaders. It is our challenge that in all the 70 Vidhan Sabha seats (in Delhi), we will have clean politicians and even if any one (corrupt person) comes, we will cancel his nomination."

Information and Broadcasting Minister Manish Tewari took to Twitter and responded: "The constitutionality or otherwise of legal enactments are tested in constitutional courts and not in the BJP's moat."

Tewari added: "Unsolicited advise is neither appreciated nor taken seriously. These are the first principles of the legal profession, advise of leader of opposition amusing/surprising."

The ordinance would save the elected members from disqualification from house, but would take away their perks. The ordinance, once approved by President Pranab Mukherjee, will have to be passed by parliament during the winter session, likely November-December.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • Ravi B Shenava, Mangalore

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    At least couple of Parties have shown that they have principles and Sanity.
    All North Indian parties are fully criminalized. Hence, they support the proposed Ordinance. Cong is surviving purely on the support of these Criminal Parties of UP - Bihar. So this Ordinance is brought mainly to save the MP/MLAs of these Parties.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • Indian, Mangalore

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    AAP will challenge the ordinance in Supreme Court if it is passed by the president. The SC said that laws should not be different for common man and MP's. This ordinance is against that. Ordinances are brought only in special cases. What was the urgency of ordinance in this case?

    DisAgree Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • kiran, mangalore

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    NOW CONGIS ARE EXPOSED. THEY HAVE PROVED TODAY THAT, THEY CAN SELL OUR COUNTRY JUST FOR REMAINING IN POWER. Today i appreciate the sensible comments from Daiji Readers Thank u all.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [11] Reply Report Abuse

  • alice, kirem/new delhi

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    Well said Mr. Bhandarkar. Yeh keval dikhawa hai.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [3] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sudhakar, Kallianpur

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    These peoples are not reading the article before writing comments. They are writing just for खुजली(itching)or to show their dissent to any particular party.

    DisAgree [5] Agree [2] Reply Report Abuse

  • Rajesh Shetty, Mlore-Shj

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    So now its proved that who is exactly behind this ordinance move HAHAH. Why is congress party interested in moving this ordinance, because more than half of its members are convicted of some crime or the other.
    JAI HO, JAGO INDIA JAGO. Look whom you have chosen.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [15] Reply Report Abuse

  • Prashanth, Mlore

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    What do you mean by "cabinet constitutes all parties"? Which country news paper you read and follow?

    DisAgree [1] Agree [8] Reply Report Abuse

  • grace pinto,

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    Obviously with consensus. I meant to say cabinet approval

    DisAgree [1] Agree [1] Reply Report Abuse

  • CONRAD JOHN TAURO, SHIRVA/UDUPI/DUBAI

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    Politics ka chor police khel.

    DisAgree Agree [6] Reply Report Abuse

  • grace pinto,

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    The earlier announcement here saying that
    " The cabinet Tuesday approved an ordinance to negate a Supreme Court (SC) order disqualifying MPs and MLAs if convicted in a criminal case... IANS " Cabinet constitutes all parties and now this announcement - truly confused!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    What's going on?

    DisAgree [6] Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • jeevan, mangalore

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    Beware.. this is dongi congi begining....If we keep silent dongi congi will not hesitate to enact ordiance to protect the terrorist too for vote bank...

    DisAgree [2] Agree [20] Reply Report Abuse

  • Harish, Mangalore

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    Here in India, Congress Govt is not taking care about the people, it only require number of votes. Down down congress....

    DisAgree [4] Agree [21] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jossey Saldanha, Mumbai

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    Will our FEKU's be allowed to CONTEST.....

    DisAgree [27] Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse

  • siddarth, mangalore

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    Feku Ghandhi you mean ?? ofcourse faku ghandhis have the birth right

    DisAgree [2] Agree [27] Reply Report Abuse

  • Sam, Mangalore

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    After all who is that feku you are always behind??????

    DisAgree [2] Agree [19] Reply Report Abuse

  • kishor, mumbai

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    Bhagwaaan
    Congress se desh bachalo

    DisAgree [4] Agree [23] Reply Report Abuse

  • Allen, Mangalore

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    No wonder, it is the duty of criminals to protect their co-criminals. What else could be expected from these corrupt politicians?

    DisAgree [1] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jago India Jago, Mangalore

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    CORRUPT CORRUPT = BHAI BHAI..
    Lalu Mulayam = Congress
    Mayavati Rasood = Congress
    Raja Pawar = Congress
    Scam Terrorism = Congress
    Corruption Rape = Congress

    For all your Problems 2014 will be the Answer...

    DisAgree [5] Agree [28] Reply Report Abuse

  • R.Bhandarkar, M'lore

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    Chor Bachaaye Chor
    Bhaake Machaaye Shor
    Committe Ke Upar Committee Core
    Bhai-Desh Apna Chale Kis Orre??

    DisAgree [2] Agree [26] Reply Report Abuse

  • India First, India

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    This is more than enough to prove that, congress is the most corrupt & have maximum number of criminals in their party.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [30] Reply Report Abuse

  • jeevan, mangalore

    Wed, Sep 25 2013

    BJP must oppose the dongi congi move..
    Slow on janlokpal... high speed on ordinance convicted lawmakers...
    Is dongi congi plan to accomadate all criminals to remain in power ???

    DisAgree [2] Agree [30] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Parties oppose ordinance on convicted lawmakers



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.