Counsel says gang-rape victim's friend 'womaniser'


New Delhi, May 10 (IANS): The male friend of the woman gang-raped here Dec 16, 2012 was Thursday described as a "womaniser" by a defence counsel in a Delhi court.

Advocate V.K. Anand, appearing for accused Mukesh, appeared before Additional Session Judge Yogesh Khanna and cross-examined the victim's male friend, the complainant in the case, on the issue of his women friends.

The court, however, intervened and said: "This question is disallowed as it is not relevant. You can't harass the witness like this. The question is disallowed being scandalous."

Anand said that the male friend of the victim had stated earlier that he had many female friends apart from her.

He said the complainant had relations with many women and he was a "womaniser".

Judge Khanna asked counsel not to "harass the witness" by asking such questions. "Do not scandalise," said court.

The court also disallowed the lawyer from raising questions about the intimate relationship between the witness and the gang-rape victim who was with him at the time of being gang-raped by six men in a moving bus in south Delhi.

"We are not holding the trial for sexual offences. It is effecting the character of the victim," the court told Anand, asking him to ask only relevant questions.

The male friend of the victim had appeared before the court to depose as a prosecution witness in the case. His cross-examination would continue Friday.

Special Public Prosecutor Dayan Krishnan also raised objection on Anand's questions.

Another defence counsel Vivek Sharma, appearing for accused Pawan Gupta, told the court that the accused "must have done this (gang rape) under some provocation".

The court also refused to allow the counsels to ask questions related to the interview given by the witness to a news channel.

The 23-year-old woman was brutally tortured and gang-raped by five men and a juvenile. She later died in a Singapore hospital.

The juvenile is facing proceedings before a Juvenile Justice Board, while the four other accused were put up for trial in the fast track court. One of the accused allegedly committed suicide in jail.

  

Top Stories

Comment on this article

  • jacintha, Mangalore

    Fri, May 10 2013

    Lawyers are experts at side tracking the issues. Even in this case.. The lawyer needs to be warned.

    DisAgree Agree Reply Report Abuse

  • Aadil Khan, Kasaragod, Saudi Arabia

    Fri, May 10 2013

    It is quite irrelevant to the case, what character was of victim's male friend. The issue is the gang-rape and murder. The lawyer cooks up stories to weaken the case in the process of defending his client.

    I think, the lawyer is alone in this world and no female members around him and in his life. He should just imagine, had it happened to any of his family members, would he contest the case with baseless allegations. Money and fame is not greater than human values. Hope sense prevails.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [50] Reply Report Abuse

  • Jacobnelson, Bejai,Mangalore

    Fri, May 10 2013

    Advocate V K Anand need to spend some time in Rajneesh Ashram for orientation.

    DisAgree [2] Agree [24] Reply Report Abuse

  • Ravi Bhaskar Shenava, MANGALORE

    Fri, May 10 2013

    Because of such inhuman, shameless, cold-blooded behaviour of the defending Lawyers all over India, the Victims never used to come forward to fight legally against Rapists.
    Hope even such heartless lawyers have daughters or sisters.

    DisAgree [1] Agree [90] Reply Report Abuse

  • George A. Borromeo, Angelore, Mangalore, India

    Fri, May 10 2013

    Mr. Ravi I wonder why can't Delhi people/Students start protesting against these kind of sadist Lawyers who take pride in taunting and embarrassing the Witnesses and even the Rape Victim.

    DisAgree Agree [7] Reply Report Abuse


Leave a Comment

Title: Counsel says gang-rape victim's friend 'womaniser'



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.