SC adjourns hearing on Umar Khalid's bail plea


New Delhi, Jan 31 (IANS): The Supreme Court on Wednesday adjourned hearing on a bail plea filed by former JNU scholar and student activist Umar Khalid who is behind bars under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA) in the Delhi riots "larger conspiracy" case.

A bench, headed by Justice Bela M. Trivedi, could not take up the matter for hearing, including the clutch of petitions challenging the constitutionality of the UAPA, due to paucity of time.

"We will keep it tomorrow," the bench, also comprising Justice J.B. Varale, told senior advocate Kapil Sibal.

In response, Sibal, who appeared on Khalid’s behalf, submitted that he will not be available for arguing the case on Thursday as he will be before the 7-judge Constitution Bench hearing the issue of minority status of Aligarh Muslim University (AMU).

Further, it was suggested that the hearing on other connected items challenging the provisions of anti-terror law may commence.

As the bench rose for the day, it said: "We will see tomorrow."

Last week, the top court adjourned hearing the batch of petitions because Justice Trivedi had to hold other scheduled special sittings.

The top court had earlier stressed that the matter requires hearing because Khalid is behind bars and expressed reservations on adjourning the case.

"We will not grant any adjournment…The impression goes that the Court is not taking up the matter," it had remarked.

Khalid had approached the Supreme Court after a bench of Justices Siddharth Mridul and Justice Rajnish Bhatnagar of the Delhi High Court had rejected his appeal seeking regular bail on October 18, 2022.

A trial court had earlier denied him bail in connection with the UAPA case.

 

  

Top Stories


Leave a Comment

Title: SC adjourns hearing on Umar Khalid's bail plea



You have 2000 characters left.

Disclaimer:

Please write your correct name and email address. Kindly do not post any personal, abusive, defamatory, infringing, obscene, indecent, discriminatory or unlawful or similar comments. Daijiworld.com will not be responsible for any defamatory message posted under this article.

Please note that sending false messages to insult, defame, intimidate, mislead or deceive people or to intentionally cause public disorder is punishable under law. It is obligatory on Daijiworld to provide the IP address and other details of senders of such comments, to the authority concerned upon request.

Hence, sending offensive comments using daijiworld will be purely at your own risk, and in no way will Daijiworld.com be held responsible.